Toxteth Man Sentenced for Guns and Class A B Drugs Crimes 2026

Key Points

• Daniel Estridge, 43, of Falkner Street, Toxteth, has been sentenced to five years and 10 months in prison.
• He was convicted of firearms offences plus possession and supply of Class A and Class B drugs.
• The case was prosecuted by Merseyside Police and heard at Liverpool Crown Court.
• The sentencing reflects continued efforts by law enforcement to tackle gun crime and drug dealing in the city.
• Authorities have reiterated that such convictions are part of a broader crackdown on organised criminal activity in Merseyside.
• The prison term includes both a custodial component and a period on licence.
• The judgement underlines the courts’ willingness to impose lengthy sentences for those combining guns and drugs.
• Police have stated that the conviction sends a clear message to others involved in similar activities.
• The case adds to a series of recent high-profile firearms and drugs prosecutions in the region.
• Community leaders have welcomed the result, highlighting the risks that gun and drug crime pose to local residents.

Toxteth (Liverpool Standard) July 02, 2026- Daniel Estridge, 43, from Falkner Street in Toxteth, has been sentenced to five years and 10 months after being convicted of firearms offences and drugs crimes involving Class A and Class B substances. As reported by Merseyside Police in an official news release, Estridge was found responsible for possessing a firearm and for involvement in the supply of controlled drugs, prompting Liverpool Crown Court to impose a substantial custodial term.

The sentencing follows a robust investigation by Merseyside Police, which uncovered evidence linking Estridge to both gun-related activity and drug distribution. According to the police statement, the court heard that the combination of firearms and drugs represented a serious threat to public safety, particularly in areas already affected by organised crime.

What offences led to Daniel Estridge’s imprisonment?

As detailed by Merseyside Police, Estridge was convicted of:

• Firearms offences, including possession of a prohibited weapon.
• Involvement in the supply of Class A drugs.
• Involvement in the supply of Class B drugs.

These charges were brought together in a single prosecution, reflecting the interconnected nature of gun crime and drug trafficking in the area. The court took the view that the offences were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of criminal behaviour that required a significant punitive response.

In funding their case, prosecutors drew on evidence gathered during police operations that targeted individuals involved in the illicit trade of both weapons and drugs. Merseyside Police have stressed that the conviction demonstrates the effectiveness of coordinated action between law enforcement and the Crown Prosecution Service.

How long has Daniel Estridge been sentenced for?

According to Merseyside Police, the total sentence imposed on Estridge is five years and 10 months. This term comprises a period of immediate custody followed by a period on licence, meaning that Estridge will remain subject to conditions even after release from prison.

The length of the sentence reflects the seriousness with which the court viewed the combination of firearms and drug offences. In its reasoning, the court highlighted the potential harm that such activity can cause to communities, including the risk of violence associated with gun crime and the social damage linked to drug supply.

Where was the case heard and by which authority?

The case was heard at Liverpool Crown Court, with prosecution led by Merseyside Police. As stated in the official police news release, the court considered evidence relating to both the possession of firearms and the supply of controlled drugs.

Merseyside Police have confirmed that the conviction was secured after a thorough investigation and that the sentence was handed down following a full trial process. The court’s decision aligns with previous judgments in similar cases where individuals have been found guilty of combining gun crime with drug dealing.

Why is this conviction important for Merseyside?

This case is part of a wider strategy by Merseyside Police to reduce gun crime and drug-related offending across the region. As reported by the police, the conviction of Estridge is seen as a significant step in disrupting criminal networks that operate in Toxteth and other parts of Liverpool.

Community representatives and local leaders have welcomed the outcome, noting that the presence of firearms and the supply of drugs pose serious risks to residents, including young people. The sentence is expected to reinforce the message that those involved in such activity will face robust legal consequences.

What does this sentence mean for the fight against gun crime and drugs in Liverpool?

The sentencing of Daniel Estridge underscores the ongoing priority given by Merseyside Police to tackling firearms and drug offences. In their public statement, the police emphasised that convictions like this are central to their strategy of making streets safer and reducing the influence of organised criminal groups.

The court’s decision to impose a lengthy sentence also signals that the judiciary continues to treat the combination of guns and drugs as a particularly serious form of criminal behaviour. This approach is consistent with other recent cases in Merseyside where individuals have been given multi-year terms for similar offences.

From a policy perspective, the case illustrates how law enforcement and the courts are working together to address complex criminal networks. Merseyside Police have indicated that further operations are planned to target individuals involved in the illicit trade of weapons and drugs, with the aim of preventing violence and protecting communities.

Background of the development

This sentencing follows a series of high-profile firearms and drugs prosecutions in Merseyside over recent years. In similar cases, individuals have been convicted for possessing machine guns, sub-machine guns, and other prohibited weapons, often alongside evidence of drug supply.

One notable example involved John Lewis, a 23-year-old from Parliament Street in Toxteth, who was sentenced to 29 years for his role in a shooting near a primary school and for dealing in drugs and firearms, as reported by the Crown Prosecution Service. That case highlighted how the presence of firearms can escalate the risk of violence in communities already affected by drug-related crime.

The Estridge case fits into this broader pattern, where courts are willing to impose substantial sentences on those found guilty of combining gun crime with drug offences. Merseyside Police have consistently described such convictions as part of a sustained effort to disrupt organised criminal activity and reduce the harmful impact on local residents.

Prediction: how this development can affect people in Liverpool and Merseyside

For residents in Toxteth and other parts of Liverpool, the sentencing of Daniel Estridge may contribute to a sense that law enforcement is taking firm action against gun crime and drug dealing. Community leaders are likely to use this outcome to reinforce messages about the dangers of involvement in criminal activity and to encourage locals to report suspicious behaviour.

However, the longer-term impact will depend on whether similar convictions are sustained across the region. If Merseyside Police continue to secure high-profile sentences for firearms and drugs offences, the message to potential offenders will be strengthened, potentially leading to a reduction in visible gun and drug activity. Conversely, if such convictions become less frequent, the perception of risk may increase among residents, particularly in areas where organised crime remains entrenched.

For young people in particular, cases like this serve as a clear warning that involvement with firearms and drugs can result in lengthy prison terms and long-lasting consequences. Schools, youth organisations, and community groups may use the Estridge case in prevention work, highlighting the real legal and personal costs of such behaviour.